• lividweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Isn’t this exactly the type of situation that was being used recently as an example of when an order is so blatantly illegal that the soldier is required not to follow it?

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      And all the good little soldiers followed the order anyway.

      But I always hear from ex-military how it is drilled into their heads not to do this stuff etc and that they would never yadda yadda. Push comes to shove and they willingly commit war crimes time and time again.

      • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        It seems that all those good soldiers who bravely defy orders in the name of American values only exist in propaganda content

      • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Because it comes down to the Presidential pardon powers. They can defy a blatantly illegal order, be dishonorably discharged, lose their pensions, healthcare benefits, pay, etc. or, they can follow a blatantly illegal order, and receive a pardon for it later.

        I ask you, which one would you pick?