Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, Infosys co-founder Narayana Murthy has once again called for longer working weeks has returned, this time with an emphasis on schedules like the 996-pattern used in parts of China.

Murthy’s comments revive a debate which began in 2024, when he argued that Indian employees should work 70 hours a week.

  • HopeOfTheGunblade@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    It’s not just saturday morning cartoon villain evil.

    It’s also incredibly fucking stupid.

    Anything that you get better outcomes from by making people work longer, like assembly lines, can be done better by robots anyway, and of course you as capital owner don’t have to live life after your dominant hand gets crushed and amputated.

    Anything that isn’t pure rote work, you get better results when people are not overworked and spending thirty hours a week sticking fucking pencils in your acoustic ceiling because nobody’s fucking brain works that long and hard.

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    49 minutes ago

    You could replace most management people with a rack of GPUs and nobody would notice. Mostly they are a very unimaginative lot parroting the same misguided group think that devalues the employees that create all their companies value. Infosys is a consulting company. They don’t make anything or own valuable IP. They pimp out Indian labour to undercut the labour rates and conditions in developed countries which already makes them a shitload of profit.

    You would think with increasing options to Indian professionals, their recruitment people would be shitting bricks trying to hire talent with this bullshit out there but they have probably sacked them as well. Though, if I wasn’t poor I would probably say all sorts of shit to pump share prices and cash out before the AI bubble bursts.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 minutes ago

    Higher taxes on the rich don’t go far enough, because they can just leverage their assets to corrupt democracies and roll everything back.

    Corporations need to be banned.

  • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Iceland made theor 4 day workweek experiment permanent…because it was actually more productive.

    They don’t even want all the money, they just want us to suffer

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t understand why these assholes insist on people working more hours. What’s the difference to them between 1 person working 70 hours a week or 2 people working a combined total of 70 hours if they’re both paid the same hourly rate?

    • rothaine@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 hours ago

      if they’re both paid the same hourly rate?

      That’s the fun part: you only have to pay them for 40 hours!

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You just aren’t thinking like a billionaire, man. What you do is get the two people anyway, and still force the 70 hour work week.

      Your job is not to find a reasonable steady state of operation. Your job is to exploit the resources before you (even the ones with emotions and families) to extract value for the shareholders in the most efficient way possible, before somebody even more evil and clever than you figures out a better way and we direct future fresh meat to his meat grinder instead of yours.

    • Hazor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Benefits can be expensive, and they only pay you for the 40 hours because it’s a salaried rather than hourly position. They just want free labor at the expense of the employees’ sanity.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Insurance, benefits and labor expenses. Even in places with little worker protections there are costs that scale with the number of workers instead of the number of hours.
      A brief look indicates employers in India can expect to budget on the order of 18% of an employees take home per year for those expenses.

      There are some circumstances and places in the US where you don’t need to provide as many benefits to employees who work below 40 hours. Then you see employers hire more people and schedule them for just under the threshold to give them benefits.

      The answer is always because it’s cheaper for them somehow.

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The sooner we start eating these motherfuckers the faster things will improve.

    Billionaire is a mental illness that isn’t compatible with civil society,

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    19 hours ago

    CEO: has lunch and answers a phone call. “I’m working!” Writes a proposal from a yacht “I’m working!” Goes golfing with industry buddies. “I’m working!” Paid tens of millions not including stock options. Spends time in the c-suite. Actually is working. Writes a letter about his cubicle slaves who are chained to their cubicle at work, their phone at home, unable to actually use PTO due to fear of negative performance reviews, working 50+ hours on the clock and uncounted hours off the clock “You need to work more!!” With their pay and benefits constantly under assault by managers.

    • potoooooooo ☑️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Like hell the CEO is writing a proposal himself on a yacht. That’s what his secretary, Sugartits or Kathy or whatever, is for.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’ve never seen it written so concisely before. The truth hits that much harder because of it 🫠🥲

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    23 hours ago

    “Infosys co-founder suggested slavery could be brought back with updated terms and conditions”

    This is how this news should be titled

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    1 day ago

    Crunching does not work!

    Instead, it reduces productivity to a fraction (often 10% of normal), countering any time added.

    You want to improve your productivity, you make your workers happy. Make sure they can eat, have good healthcare, have adequate family life, etc.

    We now have studies that counter the crunching myths and time theft myths.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        In actuality, yes, their job is to maximize productivity for the dollar spent, hence maximizing profits, and the best way to do that for most job pools is by improving the QoL of the workforce.

        They likely do value control over productivity, but that’s not the job of upper management. A lot of jobs (the bullshit jobs ) are to fulfill a personal need for an entourage, the illusion of business activity. That is a – human – trait.

        Our c-suite execs might believe it controlling the workforce is their job, though, if they’re inadequately educated about the current state of the art. Hopefully, their AI replacements will be more current and won’t be interfered with by the BoD or shareholders.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They actually think it’s more productive. They’re so good at gaslighting, they even do it to themselves.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        The bosses win if winning is continuing to manage the company poorly.

        The shareholders lose since cruel treatment reduces productivity and weakens profit margins. It depends on how seriously the business controllers want to actually do a capitalism and create a product and turn a profit.

  • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you follow the standard 5 day business week, that is 70 hours worked for every 50 hours not worked. Account for 8 hours of sleep a night and you have 2 hours a day to commute to your job. Literally zero time for any other needs. And that’s ONLY if you are generous enough to give everyone the weekend to recharge.

    For a 7 day work week with no days off, allowing for 8 hours of sleep per day and 2 hours of commute time, that is 4 hours a day to do anything else. I also would assume that part of the day would still be considered off hours for lunch. As well. Call it 3 hours a day for anything not work related.

    This man should be hanged for even suggesting this as a reasonable productivity schedule for any living being.

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah - there is no way that you are able to raise children or even go to the dentist checkup with such a work schedule. And if such a schedule was implemented, that would be the collapse of everything else. Cinemas, theatres, bars, events, sport clubs and so on.

    • jali67@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      These people really think they’re invincible. It makes me laugh. There’s nothing special about them. I love how they think money makes them bulletproof or from an angry mob having their way with them.