Lots of venture capital money behind it. I wonder how quickly the enshitification will begin.

  • hector@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 minutes ago

    Fuck all of these silicon valley parasites.

    Even before they maximize revenue and as a result enshitify the site, the government and monied interests will have or be able to get their hooks in them, to influence moderation, visibility, allowing influence ops now going nuclear with government connected ones utilizing the cutting edge chat bots, along with agents and bots. Some half of all interactions are fake as such now they think.

    We need to make federated social media a thing. Like this, but better instances making it more usable to get tje critical mass of users.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yeah… no. None of that sojnds appealing.

    ‘Curbing toxicity with AI’ means a bot is going to ban you because it doesn’t sarcasm.

    And ‘new tech to verify your identity’ sounds like a privacy violation at best.

    ‘Verifying that you own a product before they let you post in its community’ is a complete lack of understanding of how people use places like this.

    Digg can fuck right off.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      While AI obviously is not perfect and is flawed in many ways, having AI sift through the torrent of comments and then flag problematic submissions for human review is likely going to be extremely effective with minimal false positives. Though I do say this as a person whose Reddit account is currently banned for 3 days for “inciting violence” because of a knife-based joke.

      • pinesolcario@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Ah I see someone else suffering the same shit as myself. Inciting violence for comparatives is what happened to me. No, neither side should celebrate violence. Human life is invaluable.

        • Sunflier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 minutes ago

          True. Human life is invaluable. Problem is that we’re dealing with a lot of sub-humans. They’ve matriculated into the Republican party and chanted “Jews will not replace us” at Charlottesville.

          They are sub-humans, so their lives have no value.

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I was interested for like 15-20 seconds until I realized I have this place now and I actually don’t give an exploding flying fuck

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    Digg tried to unseat reddit decades ago. Didn’t fly then, likely not gonna fly now

  • stormio@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Plus, Rose suggests Digg could use signals acquired from mobile devices to help verify members — for instance, the app could identify when Digg users attended a meetup in the same location.

    Maybe I’m being paranoid, but this does not sound like a good thing for privacy.

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    However, the rise of AI has presented an opportunity to rebuild Digg, Rose and Ohanian believe, leading them to acquire Digg last March through a leveraged buyout by True Ventures, Ohanian’s firm Seven Seven Six, Rose and Ohanian themselves, and the venture firm S32. The company has not disclosed its funding.

    May as well get the shovel already.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I got about a quarter way through the article before realizing that I don’t care in the slightest.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Superior technology does not necessarily mean a superior product. History has plenty of examples where the inferior technology won out because the majority of people don’t care about having the best or most advanced technology, they want the easiest, cheapest and (most importantly) lowest effort.

      To be clear, I don’t think digg is a superior product either, I’m just saying that how good the tech is matters far less than people want to believe. What truly matters is the implementation.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I highly doubt anyone on the fediverse will migrate from here to there. Perhaps Digg wants Redditors to switch over to them? I don’t really understand who this is for.

  • iatenine@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    8 hours ago

    They’re betting that AI can help to address some of the messiness and toxicity of today’s social media landscape. At the same time, social platforms will need a new set of tools to ensure they’re not taken over by AI bots posing as people.

    “We’re banking on AI as a competitive advantage but also, here’s why it’s bad” is quite a business strategy