• CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Huh.

    Why not?

    I thought this was the most transparent administration in history? Why would something like the most notorious pedophile ring be off-limits?

  • bitteroldcoot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m calling bullshit on this.
    Has no one here ever watched one of these shit show hearings? They will happily clean Pam’s shoes with their tongue with no prompting at all.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Instructed by whom, exactly? The article doesn’t say. It just says “a source in the Republican establishment”. That could be anyone.

    My money is on Stephen Miller. It sounds like a thing he would say…

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Instructed by themselves and each other. They don’t need to be told to circle the wagons.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 minutes ago

        The article was quite clear that they were told by a particular someone in the “Republican Establishment”, which right now is a subsidiary of Trump.

        No, they don’t need to be told to hold the partisan line, but I wouldn’t put it past Trump (or even Stephen Miller) to treat them like employees. Which must be a bit humiliating for a Member of Congress…