Or in hope that they will start flying to shit on the neighbour’s roof instead of your car.

If we had a reason and the ability to stack all elephants on top of each other, we wouldn’t ask about their opinion on the process.

Don’t be sad: there will be another tomorrow tomorrow.

Blood/Duke Nukem 3d or other Build engine based games allow underwater swimming.

A few ones?

Incidents?

Germans?

And what does it have to do with smartphones? You think that “social media” is “antisocial”? Well, then write it as “ban social media”. Be precise with formulations.

Smartphones make us more social, allowing us to reach each other ad hoc, not just by planning the meeting for a week. They makes us more free by providing helping tools like GPS and similar. They make us happier by helping to kill time while standing in the line or riding on the bus.

You’re doing something wrong.

Just read the law. The article is just an example. The law would say something about public oferte and it isn’t important what exactly services you provide. If you sell something then you should sell it in indiscriminatory way. Buy? The same approach.

Here some info on the theme for my country:

https://consumerhm.gov.ua/791-shcho-potribno-znati-pokuptsyu-koli-jomu-vidmovlyayutsya-prodati-tovar-v-magazini

Local laws don’t allow to say no to customer. Many real life countries have similar laws too.

Give me money. AI-AI-AI.

Whacky Wheels forever! Fuck Nintendo!

I couldn’t care less about your appointment problems so I can say “go fuck yourself” without hesitation.

What is ruction? And why should it be constant?

It’s important propaganda-wise, because

Exactly

copying is sometimes too morally very similar to a robbery

Never. Robbery involves violence plus moving something of value from the victim to the robber. Your moral compass is broken already by the propaganda you mentioned earlier.

You may think that copying is “bad” in some cases but it never “armed violent values extortion” bad. Never.

It depends.

It doesn’t :)

Piracy is a sea ship attack. “Unauthorized copying” is the term you seek. Copying doesn’t involve attacks, killing, or even robbing, but piracy – does. And no, it isn’t just some terminology casus. Law strictly differentiate killing, raping, robbing and unauthorized copying.

No, I don’t talk stupid shit. It is important.

“Piracy” isn’t piracy.

Corporation: Hint taken! Hey, YouTube, buddy, please ban those poor idiots. You know, business reasons…