drzoidberg

Wish they were #3 in this instance.

That makes so much more sense.

I don’t know how you one-up the first game.

They could release a complete game that’s playable, with the content they claimed would be in it, for starters.

I mean, honestly, the bar for this sequel to one up its predecessor is pretty low.

https://onemileatatime.com/qatari-royal-family-747-sale/

This isn’t the first jet, or first time, they’ve tried to offload one of their 747s.

The last time they couldn’t sell one of their 747s, they gifted it to Turkeys president.

I dunno what AI is, do you mean A1 Jesus crowd?

That makes sense. The only thing that might get confusing would be referencing a comment from a different thread.

DuckDuckGo is so much better than Google. Barely any ads, and results that are actually useful 9 times out of 10.

I had something similar from a flea market surplus shop when I was in HS and kept it in the bed of my Tacoma to hold tools. It was cool as hell with its desert camo paint and dings and stuff. Well, after 9/11 I became popular with the cops cause I’d get pulled over, and told to stand by the hood of my car with both hands on it, while they checked it.

After about the 5th time, I sold it and bought a bed box.

Reddit isn’t government.

Just saying brother’s ink or toner is first party instantly makes it sound like other brands are inferior.

No, it doesn’t. Saying third party just means not manufactured by first party, first party being printer manufacturer.

Would you not buy Baldurs Gate 3 cause it’s a third party game? Would you not buy Call of Duty because it’s a third party game? Do you pay more for gas at ExxonMobil, because Costco sells third party gas for cheaper?

You buy third party all the time. Saying third party sounds bad is just stupid.

If you’re stupid, yes. If you have half a brain, it’s not.

If you play in the MLB and take steroids, you get suspended, and if you keep taking steroids, you get a lifetime suspension. Steroids aren’t illegal. That’s not censorship. It’s breaking the rules and facing the consequences of breaking the rules.

If you’re stupid and think facing consequences for breaking a rule you agreed to is censorship, that’s on you for being stupid.

Removed by mod

Going against an agreement you agreed to abide by is not censorship. If you don’t like the agreement, don’t agree to it.

No. Nothing reddit is doing is illegal. When you sign up for a service like reddit, there is a TOS, which allows them to ban, warn, limit interaction, etc, at their discretion when terms of their TOS are violated.

If their TOS doesn’t allow pictures of butterflies, and you post pictures of butterflies, you will receive a warning. Continue posting butterflies, you’ll get banned, until eventually receiving a permaban. There is absolutely nothing illegal about it, because their TOS specifically states no butterfly pictures.

It’s probably not AI, and could be considered revenge porn.