• ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    As much as I hate Trump, there’s a logic in this. VOA has always been a publicly-funded propaganda mouthpiece. They are NOT an independent media. Independence entails not taking money from people you want to criticize.

    If VOA refuses to spew out the latest flavor of propaganda, they’re not doing their job.

      • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        But what you don’t understand is that VOA is not a news organization. It was created during WW2 by the Office of the Coordinator of Information for the express purpose of spreading pro-American propaganda in Germany and in Japan. And it has kept doing exactly that ever since.

        I remember it showering the USSR with pro-American high-power shortwave radio broadcasts in Russian and in English when I was a kid in the 70’s. Everybody knew VOA was America’s response to radio Moscow.

        VOA is quite explicitely a propaganda thing. Really! You guys can downvote me all you want, it’s the plain truth. VOA journalists are quite literally paid to spread American propaganda.

        His Orangeness has decided to turn the country around 180 degrees and make it a fascist pro-Russia state and I despise him with all my heart. But Trump is right: the VOA has no business not being 100% aligned with him.

        That makes the VOA an enemy of freedom, democracy and common decency, just like Trump.

        • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          From the VOA website:

          An essential guarantee of the journalistic credibility of Voice of America content is the “firewall” enshrined in the 1994 U.S. International Broadcasting Act. The firewall prohibits interference by any U.S. government official in the objective, independent reporting of news, thereby safeguarding the ability of our journalists to develop content that reflects the highest professional standards of journalism, free of political interference.

      • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It would be better if it did, but you shouldn’t be surprised if it doesn’t, anymore than you should expect the Washington Post to criticize Bezos or Fox News Rupert Murdoch.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Independence entails not taking money from people you want to criticize.

      No it doesn’t. Criticizing those that fund you would literally be one of the more independent things a group could do.

    • adam_y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think you are getting down voted, not because you are wrong, but because that truth is particularly unpleasant.

      It would be like radio free Europe criticising Regan’s policies during the cold war.

    • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      VOA takes money from US taxpayers, not the Trump administration. Criticizing Trump is about as pro-American as that news organization can get.