Obviously reporting transphobic comments to a transphobic mod isn’t going to result in any action, so I’m wondering if the admins are going to do anything about it?

(if someone needs an image description, please ask)

  • vzq@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If a community isn’t safe for trans people, it’s not safe for anyone. The mob just hasn’t gotten around to abuse you yet.

  • bayesianbandit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    You know what? As a woman who’s had a sex change, I am so tired. I could not give a shit about this mods opinions or any of this topic from anybody.

    It’s quite simply a topic that loses us support for emotional gut vibe reasons that have nothing to do with rationality. And for what?

    I’ve never played women’s sports. Nobody trans I’ve ever met plays women’s sports because we’re all fucking afraid of it and always have been.

    We are less than 1% of the population and of that 1% maybe 1% is anywhere near ballsy enough to even begin to try in this environment let alone having the resources to try competing on top of much more pressing matters like surgeries and hormones.

    Are these people ignorant and on the wrong side of history here? Absolutely.

    Have transsex people been playing sports for decades without issue and without dominating even one out of hundreds of different sports? Absolutely.

    Are they just making shit up about transsex bodies based off nothing but unchecked stereotypes and ignorance because they only ever notice the most visible and non-passing ones and have no idea how many of us are stealth? 1000% you betcha.

    Could whatever nuanced future issues be resolved by simply introducing additional classes according to measurable biological traits like weight or shoulder span in the few cases where perhaps one day there will be reason to? Yepppp.

    Is this whole conversation actually just misogynistic control over women’s bodies that will ultimately harm quantitatively more cis women than trans women? Yep!! And they are better poised to tackle that than us when it does.

    And yet? I want everybody to shut up about it because we have far more pressing issues at hand. When it comes to women’s sports the public has made up their mind and the facts don’t matter.

    We’re losing access to life saving medical care, being deplatformed, and criminalized for existing in public and y’all still think this is about pointless debates over sports. The public does not have much bandwidth in their minds to spare on us & it’s imperative we get off this topic.

    If someone thinks I’m a “biological male” who shouldn’t play women’s sports I don’t frankly care. As long as they don’t interfere with us building robust community organizations to ensure everybody has means to survive the Nazis in coming years, it’s fine.

    Frankly they can call me a biological male all day if they want to deliver some hormones to a girl who needs them. They’d still be stupid and wrong but at least useful then.

    • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      And yet? I want everybody to shut up about it because we have far more pressing issues at hand. When it comes to women’s sports the public has made up their mind and the facts don’t matter.

      So do I, which is why I reported those comments to be removed, but then realised that the only mod in the community agrees, and so they wouldn’t only not be removed, but more of them would be encouraged, which I think is unacceptable, especially if the instance hosting them has rules against bigotry, which is what this is.

    • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Literally nobody in the trans community cares about this topic until conservatives discovered it was effective.

      🙇🏻‍♀️🙇🏻‍♀️🙇🏻‍♀️

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    OK that’s the last straw for me. I am willing to give the benefit of a doubt to people, but this is the third strike for this person. So I’ve asked them to move their comm to another instance as they don’t align with our instance values.

          • Didros@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Replace ‘trans’ with any other group, does it sound bigoted to you now? It reads like ‘we can’t have black girls compete with white girls because of the clear advantage in physicality’ you know, the common racist talking point of old?

              • Didros@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                No. Look into the history of the first woman to run the Boston Marathon and how people believed that the jostling of the running would kill a woman. That is the world that allowed women’s sports only as it’s own category. Some sports like tennis it might make sense on a competitive compromise. But to apply that thinking to high-school sport, which is more about community than competition, it is just clear exclusion.

              • Microw@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                What clear advantage? Men and women on average have different body structures, yes. That might favour one in one sport and one in another. The blanket statement “men have a clear advantage in every sport over women” is BS.

              • Didros@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                It’s just so mind-boggling to me that you can respond to my statement with no critical thinking at all. Do you not even consider the possibility that you could be wrong? I can’t even process that level of arrogance.

                • I absolutely contemplated the the situation that I could be wrong I then went and read a bunch of peer reviewed journals on the subject including ones sent to me by people here on Lemmy. Then based on reading those articles concluded that I was not wrong.

                  You my friend are the one too arrogant to contemplate if you are wrong.

          • stray@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Assuming you’re genuinely uninformed and confused, trans women do not have any advantages over cis women if they’ve been on HRT. The lack of testosterone affects the body dramatically. You can see evidence of this in the fact that trans women aren’t dominating any of the competitions which have allowed them.

            Furthermore, sports were never fair in the first place. Some people are more naturally gifted in various areas than others. There are actually cis female athletes who have been forced to medically lower their natural testosterone levels in the name of fairness, and that’s some Harrison Bergeron shit.

            • Microw@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              if they have been on HRT

              This might actually be the most important thing here: I have no idea how youth sports handle things (and under the current fascist climate competing as a trans athlete surely is nearly impossible), but if they were to compete without HRT they might have an advantage (in specific sports)?

              It’s such a small if combination of things that it’s not worth making a fuss over about, but it might be the one case where it could be true?

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Is it transphobic or just woefully ignorant? (I have a point to asking that, bear with me)

    I’ve not seen them talk about trans issues before, and haven’t looked yet to see. Edit: I went to look and see. Jfc, they’re an idiot. May or may not be a transphobe, but they are talking about shit that is so far off of reality in multiple places that I don’t even know how to unpack it all. Don’t go brigading, don’t go fucking with them, but holy fuck. I can’t even. It makes it impossible to tell them apart from a transphobe because damn, there is some serious lack of thinking going on.

    But, believe it or not, some people are just stupid, rather than bigoted. It’s impossible to tell the difference most of the time, but with user histories, you can check and see if they’re consistent on lemmy.

    That’s the whole problem with propaganda. It works. You get enough people parroting inaccurate, or outright made up information, it spreads, and not everyone has the background to recognize how dumb it actually is.

    Now, for anyone reading this that holds the opinion stated in the screen shot based on supposed facts, it is simply bullshit. Once someone begins hormone treatment, the changes begin. Those changes functionally erase the “advantages” that are claimed. It is utter tripe. The younger the person is when they begin hormonal treatment, the less time it takes for the supposed advantages to go away.

    Now, here’s something else interesting. If the person is an athlete before hormones, and after, the changes from that tend to stay in place. But, and this is the key part, someone born with a functionally female endocrine system and is an athlete before and during puberty has those same advantages.

    That’s right. The way bodies change from sustained athletic training are more significant than those from hormones alone.

    Muscle attachment points, as a primary example. They form from using one’s body, and that doesn’t play favourites. You lift more, you get bigger attachments. You work harder, you get more.

    Now, having bigger muscles does increase that. But even that changes post transition. The bones still shift and reshape. You lose that advantage over time.

    So, anyone arguing that having previously been exposed to testosterone is a permanent advantage is wrong.

    At most there might be a period of time where the body changes that there may be a temporary advantage. But it will go away.

    You know how we know it’ll go away? Records. Go look up the world records for some sports and athletic endeavors. Trans women have competed alongside cis women plenty. There’s no trend of trans women dominating any sport. It isn’t there. Go look at weightlifting in specific, the sport where having lifted while having high testosterone is the biggest advantage possible. Where’s the trans women wrecking those records?

    Yeah. Exactly. Despite there being trans lifters men and women, trans athletes simply don’t perform better as a group. Trans women lifters lose muscle mass and drop their maxes. It isn’t immediately, it does take time. But you’ll see it start in a matter of a month or two of starting anti-androgens, much less the rest of hormonal treatment.

    But, and I think it important to say, I know this because I have a background as a lifter, and low level medical training. Not everyone would know this. Someone without that advantage might not immediately see the claims of advantages and not know it’s bullshit. They’d have to actually fact check the claims instead of swallowing them whole. Which is why it could be stupidity instead of bigotry.

    Also, there are top level cis female athletes that have way higher testosterone naturally than other cis women, and definitely higher than trans women. So, if anything, a trans athlete up against one of them would be disadvantaged. Mind you, having higher testosterone isn’t a gimme for gold medals. Those women, even with that hormonal boost lose to women without it. So, you know, an even bigger hole in the propaganda.

    Since nobody that whines about trans athletes ever bothers to suggest waiting periods before competing as their confirmed gender, you can tell they’re either an idiot, or a bigot. The issue is figuring out which, since they look the same.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes. But a transphobe is different from a transphobic idea.

        The post wasn’t about someone saying something transphobic, it was about someone being a transphobe. Those are not inherently the same, which was the entire point of my comment.

        • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Those are not inherently the same,

          Yes, they are, like I said, you don’t have to mean it to be transphobic for it to be transphobic. People who are ignorant and get called out who don’t want to be transphobes will admit ignorance, apologise, and improve their behaviour. Anything else makes a person a transphobe, no matter how uncomfortable that makes you.

          • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            We’re talking at cross purposes here.

            You’re presenting absolutes, I’m saying it isn’t absolute. There’s no room for anything with that. I’ve said my bit, you’ve said yours. Thank you for your time.

    • Petter1@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think most transphobic people are just stupid and are in fact feared from complexity. The world got too complex too fast for them and now they try to force the world to be non complex and fully predictable.

      I think the main reason is lack of education about empathy…