compostgoblin@slrpnk.net to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoISO 8601slrpnk.netimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up122arrow-down1imageISO 8601slrpnk.netcompostgoblin@slrpnk.net to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square82fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaremissandry351@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoNo! It’s the other way around, from largest to smallest is a mess and it makes no sense
minus-squareMapleMan@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoIf you name files or other data with ISO 8601 then they’re always sorted chronologically when you go largest to smallest.
minus-squareWalk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoSo true, bestie! That’s why all the clocks in my house are formatted ss:mm:hh
minus-squaremodeler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoI know, right! I’ve been campaigning for this for everyday numbers. For example, twenty seven should be written smallest first: 72. Likewise this year is 5202, and next year 6202. That way no-one’s going to be confused at all.
minus-squaremissandry351@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoWhat you said is stupid
No! It’s the other way around, from largest to smallest is a mess and it makes no sense
If you name files or other data with ISO 8601 then they’re always sorted chronologically when you go largest to smallest.
So true, bestie! That’s why all the clocks in my house are formatted ss:mm:hh
I know, right! I’ve been campaigning for this for everyday numbers. For example, twenty seven should be written smallest first: 72. Likewise this year is 5202, and next year 6202. That way no-one’s going to be confused at all.
What you said is stupid