• ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Okay? How is that relevant. I was making a point that there are many people who don’t speak English.

    While what you say is objectively true what I say is also true. Further, the number of people who do not speak English (roughly 6.5 billion) dwarf the number who do. America and the English language do not define the entire world.

    Further, the local English speaker is not always proficient enough to articulate the meaning of what is being said into the local tongue. Even for someone who is a fantastic translator interpreting someone like trump, who constantly utilizes colloquial speech and idioms, is a goddamn nightmare.

    • thedruid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      You inferred that his words, because they were in English, do not reach everyone. They do.

      Those 1.6 billion includes many who disseminate his words in their own native tongue

      It’s common knowledge that for propaganda of any sort one needs those who speak local dialects directly employed. And there are people who target every word of his into the local dialects of whoever they want to hear the message. That’s basic marketing.

      The curse of the interconnected world is that everyone can be magnified everywhere instantly. Even megalomaniacal egomaniacs.

      So while , sure you’re technically correct, it’s also incorrect to assume that because most of the world doesn’t speak English as a primary language , that his words aren’t delivered to their ears. Whatever he wants heard by everyone, is heard by everyone.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        His point was that the translations are filtered and refined by media, particularly in foreign languages.