just_another_person@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agoTrump administration mulling end to habeas corpus, legal right to challenge one’s detentionwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1283arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1279arrow-down1external-linkTrump administration mulling end to habeas corpus, legal right to challenge one’s detentionwww.theguardian.comjust_another_person@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square24fedilinkfile-text
Losing everywhere in courts, so now you think you can just sidestep them by changing the constitution? Lolz
minus-squareBlameThePeacock@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36arrow-down2·1 day ago“privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” That’s the wording in the constitution. They just say that undocumented migrants amount to an invasion and they can suspend it. It’s not like the supreme court is going to override them on that.
minus-squareTransplantedSconie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 day agoI dunno. The appeals court straight up said it is in no way, shape, or form an invasion, and they have to have their day in court no if, and, or buts. I think it’s 7-2 against trump.
“privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”
That’s the wording in the constitution. They just say that undocumented migrants amount to an invasion and they can suspend it.
It’s not like the supreme court is going to override them on that.
I dunno.
The appeals court straight up said it is in no way, shape, or form an invasion, and they have to have their day in court no if, and, or buts.
I think it’s 7-2 against trump.