• GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I don’t think anyone would consider complete verbatim recitement of the material to be anything but a copyright violation, being the exact same thing that you produce.

    Fair use requires the derivative work to be transformative, and no transformation occurs when you verbatim recite something.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        existing copyright law covers exactly this. if you were to do the same, it would also not be fair use or transformative

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’d be impressed with any model that succeeds with that, but assuming one does, the complete works of Shakespeare are not copyright protected - they have fallen into the public domain since a very long time ago.

        For any works still under copyright protection, it would probably be a case of a trial to determine whether a certain work is transformative enough to be considered fair use. I’d imagine that this would not clear that bar.