Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoJudge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted bookswww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1189arrow-down15
arrow-up1184arrow-down1external-linkJudge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted bookswww.bbc.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-squarebob_omb_battlefield@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 day agoYeah, I guess the debate is which is the lesser evil. I didn’t make the original comment but I think this is what they were getting at.
minus-squareNomad Scry@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 day agoAbsolutely. The current copyright system is terrible but an AI replacement of creators is worse.
minus-squareGrimy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 day agoYes precisely. I don’t see a situation where the actual content creators get paid. We either get open source ai, or we get closed ai where the big ai companies and copyright companies make bank. I think people are having huge knee jerk reactions and end up supporting companies like Disney, Universal Music and Google.
Yeah, I guess the debate is which is the lesser evil. I didn’t make the original comment but I think this is what they were getting at.
Absolutely. The current copyright system is terrible but an AI replacement of creators is worse.
Yes precisely.
I don’t see a situation where the actual content creators get paid.
We either get open source ai, or we get closed ai where the big ai companies and copyright companies make bank.
I think people are having huge knee jerk reactions and end up supporting companies like Disney, Universal Music and Google.