• arrow74@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Unfortunately viewed from the constitutionalist theory which has always existed within the court it does make sense. There is a fair argument, one i personally disagree with, that the result of Roe is not in the constitution and therefore not something the court can legislate from the bench. Likewise with the arguments used against Trans youth.

    I don’t like these decisions, I don’t support these decisions, but they do exist within the traditional frameworks and legal arguments of courts past. We’ve been rather fortunate for the past 30 or so years to have a more liberal court that prefers to take an interpretive view.

    The only decision they’ve made recently that is outside of that is the idea that the president has total immunity for “official acts” that has no basis in the constitution at all.

    If anything the current court make up emphasizes why things like Roe should have been codified years ago.

    These are dark times for many of the liberties we all enjoy, but for the most part this courts actions do line up with historical precedent of a conservative court. It is a nightmare, and far too many people are going to suffer. I just hope that we all make it out of this and Institute real reforms across the board.