• rosie2007@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Omg, I’m literally not talking about corporations, though? Barbie is a well-established character. It embodies a concept.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      My bad, didn’t realize you were a 12 hour account, we’ve probably been thru something like this on your last account too.

      No worries, I’ll handle it.

      • rosie2007@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mentioned Barbie, a fictional character, and you responded as if I had deified Mattel. I clarified what I meant, but you continued with an unprompted anti-capitalism rant and even insinuated that I’m a troll. Very mature and pleasant of you. P.S. As someone whose country already endured 42 years of communist, anti-West/anti-capitalist rule, please spare me the anti-capitalism rant next time. Thanks.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          fascism wears many hats. these tankie motherfuckers wear the bolshevik-fascism hat. they don’t understand that we can take a stock character given to us by a corporation, like barbie, and run with it as an aspect of remix culture because they are domination culture colonisers who cosplay as anti-imperialists. they are just as dangerous and nonsensical as ancaps.

          good for you for knowing enough about who you are and what you’re about to stay strong in “this isn’t about the corporation but the stock character”