• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    24 hours ago

    And it did all of that because some executive thought that would make the most money…

    If they thought the opposite message would have made more money, that’s what the character would have done.

    Like, I dunno.

    It doesn’t seem that complicated to me, but apparently it is.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      If art is good, I’ll appreciate it even when the people funding it aren’t doing it for the love of art.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Nothing wrong with that, I really enjoyed it too.

        But that doesn’t mean the next movie will be the same.