• Skavau@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    They believe that Ofcom could pressure their hosts to cut their services off if they don’t comply with the act, or believe they could be fined.

    • misk@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      How would that even work in another country? Wouldn’t Saudi Arabia pressure hosts for breaking blasphemy laws?

      • Skavau@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Saudi Arabia has no soft power here. UK does.

        Not saying that UK will here (I think they won’t), but the relationship dynamics are a bit different.

        • misk@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Saudi Arabia has plenty of soft and hard power too. Possibly more so than UK. I think we’re getting overly dramatic. UK doesn’t have enough pull to start extraditing thousands of people for not complying with their weirdo laws.

          • Skavau@piefed.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            Not when it comes to tech. You think the USA would let Saudi Arabia force the total shut-down of a USA-based site because they allowed people to make fun of Islam? Come on. Saudi Arabia just quiety blocks sites.

            UK doesn’t have enough pull to start extraditing thousands of people for not complying with their weirdo laws.

            I agree with you there too. The forum owners here fear Ofcom pressuring their hosts to force compliance, not extradition. I think its misguided and unlikely (especially for small arms of the fediverse) but it is what it is.