• SaltSong@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 miesiące temu

    Right, but this tariff, at least as I understand it, is on chips imported as chips, not on products that contain chips. An iPhone will, of course, be subject to some other damn fool tariff, but not this specific one.

    Of course, my understanding of this specific tariff may be wrong.

      • SaltSong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 miesiące temu

        That’s generally how tariffs work. A tariff on grain is not a tariff on bread. A tariff on steel is not a tariff on knives. A tariff on cotton is not a tariff on clothing.

        It can be, of course. A tariff can be on steel and items made with steel. But that’s not usually the case, and it’s usually called out as such. Of course, Trump is not what you’d call the most precise communicator in the world, but all we can do is work with what he says.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 miesiące temu

          That’s not how tariffs work. You can’t just circumvent them by packaging them differently.

          • SaltSong@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 miesiące temu

            Packaging, no. But manufacturing it into something else, yes.

            Do you think a tariff on copper would apply to an iPhone? Or a tariff on oil?

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 miesiące temu

              Do you think a tariff on copper would apply to an iPhone?

              …of course?

              Or a tariff on oil?

              Do your iPhones usually take oil? 🤔