• m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    We had those handheld scanner at the store I usually go, but they removed them as the theft rate was supposedly higher.

    Can’t have nice things…

    • dunz@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Here you need to use your receipt to get out, and there’s (pretty infrequent) checks. Like once every 10th time they’ll randomly scan five items

        • dunz@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Too bad, most larger stores here have them, I love it. Shopping is so quick this way, every thing is already in the bag when you leave, and you just tap your card to pay, and leave by scanning a barcode on your receipt.

          Edit: here being Sweden

          • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah it was great, especially for packing frozen stuff right away in thermal bags 🥲

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ever since I saw that the grocery store near the train station in my city (which is famously one of the worst in the country in terms of crime) had self checkout without even a gate to scan your receipt for a while (they added it now) and has the handheld scanners, I’ve been assuming that the added theft from either really can’t be that bad, or is a result of poor security. Clearly it’s worth it for the higher customer throughput for that store, so I kinda doubt it could be that bad especially in safer areas.

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I guess the store I went lost more money than what the cost of maintaining these barcode scanners and the system itself was.