moe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoMozilla under fire for Firefox AI "bloat" that blows up CPU and drains batterywww.neowin.netexternal-linkmessage-square301fedilinkarrow-up11.16Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.14Karrow-down1external-linkMozilla under fire for Firefox AI "bloat" that blows up CPU and drains batterywww.neowin.netmoe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square301fedilink
minus-squareJonsJava@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·17 hours agoI only use Firefox. I’ve only used Firefox since 2000. They, by their own statements, are a 501( C )3, which is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit. Sit down.
minus-squarenull_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·6 hours agoYou seem to be able to google “mozilla non profit” but unable to elucidate whether it is in fact a non-profit and why that is so. Again, you’re offering hand wavy vibe based explanations as to why mozilla is “bad”. What exactly is the problem?
minus-squareJonsJava@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·5 hours agoI have worked for non-profits. They are completely allowed to make a profit. You are mistakenly under the impression that I’m against Mozilla. If you go back to my original comment, I merely explained what I explained here. Mozilla is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit. You decided to take that as an attack on Mozilla, for some strange reason, and attacked me. I just turned that same energy back on you. Did I ever attack Mozilla? Did you attack me?
I only use Firefox. I’ve only used Firefox since 2000.
They, by their own statements, are a 501( C )3, which is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit.
Sit down.
You seem to be able to google “mozilla non profit” but unable to elucidate whether it is in fact a non-profit and why that is so.
Again, you’re offering hand wavy vibe based explanations as to why mozilla is “bad”. What exactly is the problem?
I have worked for non-profits.
They are completely allowed to make a profit.
You are mistakenly under the impression that I’m against Mozilla.
If you go back to my original comment, I merely explained what I explained here. Mozilla is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit.
You decided to take that as an attack on Mozilla, for some strange reason, and attacked me. I just turned that same energy back on you.
Did I ever attack Mozilla? Did you attack me?