• bryndos@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Interested to know how much less for lower resolutions. I’m not sure I’ve ever cared for high resolutions - and I’d always pick more battery life given the choice.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      As long as the GPU is halfway reasonable the resolution of the video has very little impact on power draw. Most of the power draw is the screen, and the fact that the CPU and GPU are active. That’s one of the reasons why Intels core 100 series and up have the LP E cores in a separate tile from the regular E and P cores.

    • sga@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      on my laptop (specs wise - consider steam deck non oled, but worse graphics performance, 1080p screen (IPS)) - 5.3-6 Wh for 2x speed playback. for full hd playback 6-7 Wh. Idle power is much higher though 4.5 Wh, on my old laptop, video power consumption consumed similar power, but idle power was close to 2.5-3 Wh (in terms of specs, it had halve the number of cores, and a tn panel)

      • dgdft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Can I save a lot of battery by choosing 1080 instead of 2/4k for laptops in general?

        Yes. What your link states is that running a 4k monitor at 1080p won’t save you power (it will, but via gpu, not monitor draw).

        A 1080p monitor will require substantially less power than a 4k monitor, all other factors held equal.