• Revonult@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    So I get the idea that companies shouldn’t be slaves to shareholders or the whims of a few people, but would the employees owning the company mean they are shouldering financial risk? Like if my company goes bankrupt I just lose my job, I am not responsible for covering their losses.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think the liability would still be limited. If a company goes bankrupt it’s not like they’re going after shareholders’ personal assets to pay creditors.

    • novibe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Are you under the impression that private business owners have to cover losses…? Like that’s what a LLC is, a limited liability company. If it goes bankrupt the private owners are only liable for a part of it.

      If a private business owners goes bankrupt, he just has to, gasp, find a job.

      If a worker loses their job they might go fucking homeless.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think what he’s getting at is you lose both your job and your shares (which are presumably part of your retirement) if the co-op goes tits up. It’s more risk.

    • J Lou@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      There would still be limited liability. Furthermore, they can share risks with investors, and self-insure against risk as well @general

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Employees with stock face the same risk as any other stock owners: that the value of the stock will become zero, or just grow poorly.