• ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      What pisses me off is how many websites don’t work right with Firefox now. There’s been several times where I’ve had issues with a site functioning on Firefox and had to switch to a chromium browser.

    • voluble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I hear the term ‘broken up’ a lot in media and discourse, but it’s never explained. In your eyes, what actually happens when a government ‘breaks up’ a corporation? I mean, what are the steps, objectives, and outcomes?

      Not being adversarial, I’m just curious.

    • NekkoDroid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It really wouldn’t change anything in the long run. Any company that creates a browser is gonna need some form of income and people aren’t willing to pay for a browser. What would be their incentive to continue to work on the browser when they aren’t being paid?

      • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Same as Firefox. Let search engines (including google) pay them a fair market rate to make them the default browser.

  • ChonkaLoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    9 months ago

    Thank you Google I hope shitty moves like this drives enough people away to better browsers like Firefox. It desperately needs a bigger market share.

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not only a bigger market share. What’s keeping Firefox alive is the financial support they get from Google. If enough people move from Chrome to Firefox without Firefox also securing finances from elsewhere, Google could easily kill Firefox by just not giving them money and we’d all be left with just Chromium.

      • lemmyhavesome@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think the real reason Google is funding Firefox is because they’re afraid of being targeted in antitrust lawsuits. As long as Firefox is around, they have someone they can point to, to say they’re not a monopoly.

  • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    9 months ago

    Adblockers are the largest consumer boycott in history.

    Google isn’t just disabling an extension, they’re attacking a boycott comprised of 200,000,000+ people, all around the globe, standing up to forced manipulation of our beliefs and habits by profit-hungry corporations.

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    IT guys will stop using it…

    Which means they’ll stop deploying it as the default browser on some large enterprises, it won’t ship as defaults in pre-baked images going forward.

    Average joes and janes will use Safari and Edge depending on OS.

    Where is their growth going to come from after this change? Chromebooks? lol.

    I hope they do it, it will hurt them in the long run.

    You can bet 300 new uBlock replacements to spring up practically overnight, some of them scams, reducing trust in the Google ecostystem.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      IT guys will stop using it…

      No, they will not, if they didn’t already. Because convenience it key.

      The browser war is over, and humans lost, corporations won. Google and other huge corporations control the biggest websites and most of the access to content on the internet.

      They just need to make it inconvenient to use ad-blocking browsers.

      They built their business on advertiser gambling, which seem to be flawed concept, because they keep on squeezing that tube for every penny more and more, in a race to the bottom.

      But they are still in control of both browers and content so they have options to keep squeezing more.

      So you want to use a ad blocker? Well, the browser that supports them might not be white listed (anymore) by the bot detector, and you have to solve captchas on every site you visit, until you come to your senses and use a browser, where ad blocking is no longer possible.

      Oh, and all that is ok, because of “security”. Because letting the users be in control of their devices and applications is “in-secure”. They are just doing that to protect you from spam and scams, just trust them! Trust them, because they don’t trust you!

      • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Its not the IT guys themselves, its the aggregate influence. One large school campus flips the switch to Firefox on their next image deployment its a drop in a bucket, but when 1000 schools, 2000 government agencies and 5000 businesses all suddenly stop using Chrome the graph starts to move, because laypeople just accept the default.

        IT guys are like browser-influencers, they tell their parents what to use, friends, and so on. We all used to recommend Chrome, I don’t anymore.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s a funny way to say “you should uninstall chrome rather than leaving it unused” but I hear you Google. 🫡

    • Persen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well, I’m forced if I want to use casting to androidTV or chromecast.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    9 months ago

    The modern Internet is completely unusable without an ad blocker. Way to remake ie6, Google!

  • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    …Oh, no! Anyway. Just giving people one more reason to finally make the switch to Firefox or something different.

    Google Chrome warns about disabling uBlock Origin. I warn Google Chrome that they’re being a little bitch & they’re going to lose users.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Oh no, they are about to lose the $0 that uBlock origin users bring!

      They know they will lose users and they don’t care. They will make much more per user selling ads than before. Google is an ad company. They’re not a browser company, or a mobile OS company, or an office suite company. It’s all about ads.

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Not necessarily. They still get money from selling user data. So they likely still care about losing users who use adblocking to at least some degree.

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 months ago

    Could turn out to be a good thing. All power users will dump Chrome practically overnight, a huge boon to the alternatives, that could actually give them enough momentum to compete with Google for a change. I’m sure they’ve considered this, probably an empty treat.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        me too. a long time ago i practically forced everyone around me to switch to chrome. now I’m doing the opposite.

      • ghterve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I for one have been in denial and probably won’t switch away until it literally stops working. So, there’s hope.

  • irish_link@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Glad I have firefox as well but also looking forward to a cool new project called Ladybird. https://ladybird.org

    Not sure if its the right one but glad there are more projects out there trying to jump into the game. (I know extensions are a long way off for it but i see it as hope.)

    Also please consider running pihole or adguard home. Or any other full home DNS add blocker. It will help.

    • Jarmer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ladybird looks great! Very much looking forward to an alpha linux release so I can use it and give all kind of feedback.

    • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Looks like what I’d want to use, but to reach broad support it needs a Windows client as well.