• 0 Posts
  • 617 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 3rd, 2023

help-circle



  • IMO the best way to use this crap in software development for projects that already exist is to have the fucking things write up or amend docs.

    Developers mostly hate writing docs, and in corporate software I’ve found that the docs are usually added once and then never verified again.

    Writing up profuse gibberish that contains some amount of useful information is what these bullshit machines were made to do. Have it write up some docs, read them and make sure they aren’t completely insane and get a pat on the back from your boss for working with “agentic AI”.




  • It’s great at bullshitting that it did what you wanted, even if it obviously didn’t, which I guess is what counts for results at Microsoft.

    It would be much better if they treated it as the slightly better (yeah, I said it) auto complete that it is instead of the beginning of fucking sky net – which was supposed to be a bad thing anyway, remember?

    But that wouldn’t move the needle on all of the share prices, so instead we have to pretend it can do people’s jobs when it fucking obviously cannot.

    So, instead they keep pushing this AI (auto-complete insanity), and keep burning more and more cash. Imagine if we just put a portion of these billions (approaching trillions) into anything that could actually help anyone. Or don’t, because it’s pretty fucking depressing to think about.


  • But I’ve never had sympathy for engineers who think all the process around them is net negative, because nothings ever stopped engineers from striking out on their own, without all that, and making great businesses.

    Not all process is pointless, but needless process by definition is. There are also a shit ton of things that stop engineers from “striking out on their own”.

    If your PM and VPs are bringing you down, go it alone. If you can’t pull that together into a paycheck then maybe it’s not all as useless as some say.

    The whole talk of “go[ing] it alone” kinda strikes me as “bootstrapping”, libertarian non-sense.

    I don’t want to do marketing, sales, finance, legal, and product bullshit myself. That’s why I’m an employee.

    Two things can be true at the same time, for instance, a company can have a lot of bloated, needless process that stifles people and still pull in enough money to be able to pay for their employees to live a life.

    With the amount of market concentration there is in every sector as far as the eye can see, nearly every software-producing company has a cash cow of some sort, and then has a bunch of complete money losers that are subsidized by that cash cow.

    So, it’s completely possible that the company overall fully sucks and hasn’t developed anything new of value to someone in decades, but the legacy business keeps the miserable employees from the bread line.

    To return to the point, AI doesn’t solve any of this or even help with it.









  • Yes, a 50 year mortgage will drop your monthly payments by a significant margin (maybe 15ish percent) increasing affordability for the long term.

    The actual numbers will likely not bear that out. Some back of the envelope math in this article and others has the payments dropping as little as $150 or $200 on a $2000 mortgage.

    The problem is that rates for longer mortgages are naturally going to be higher as they are today. Most of the “gain” of stretching out the loan is eaten up by interest.

    What does never seem to catch anyone’s eye though in general is…you can pay more than the minimum on your mortgage just like any other type of debt. If these products were available, I’d be slightly tempted to use one to lower my required monthly payments slightly while I saved up the principle to repay the loan in full.