• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeah, people have been arguing about it for at least the last three years, since the first big twitter migration.

      Everyone just kind of ignored that you could screenshot a post and reply to it already.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        If you screenshot the post, there’s no guarantee it’s not doctored

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        That’s fine. The friction of typing in the person’s name to harass them from the screenshot does deter some people, it turns out.

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Same. I like that it is hard to go viral. It feels more like people talking and less like influencers (although there are some.)

            • T156@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              At the same time, the lack of virality may hurt it since it feels much more like a burgeoning project. One of the draws for someone coming off of Twitter would be feature parity, and Mastodon feeling less complete and much smaller wouldn’t help.

            • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Yup. There’s just something that makes social media better when you are forced to be more intentional about it.