• Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Genuine question, why? They reported on the information they had, even if it wasn’t flattering to the left. Then they retracted it when the information changed.

    • livejamie@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If you’re going to be the first to publish something consequential like this, you should have verified information from multiple sources, not a single phone interview.

    • neatchee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      14 hours ago

      My neighbor Steve says he knew Robinson personally, even went to the same church, and it was a brain parasite that caused him to go crazy and shoot someone.

      I’m just gonna print that in the New England Journal of Medicine, because after all, it’s the information I have, and I can always retract it later, right?

      /s 🙄

      Misinformation is deeply dangerous and respectable journalists have a duty not to print bullshit in the first place. Sure, mistakes happen, but we don’t just hand-wave it away with “well, they said sorry sooooo 🤷‍♀️”.