There’s always an xkcd
Actually, this XKCD doesn’t apply. It’s really the opposite case. I can’t figure out what cat should replace here.
Title text:
I like trying to make it as hard as possible.
“I’d love to meet up, maybe in a few days? Next week is looking pretty empty. *witchcraft”
I didn’t mean to type those six words. I meant cat.
The only sane conclusion
Cat*
Cat dicks in his brothers bum
Big cat in his brothers bum
Big dicks cat his brothers bum
Big dicks in cat brothers bum
Big dicks in his cat bum
Big dicks in his brothers cat
I think they meant 1,2,4,6 all at the same time
Cat cats in cat brother’s cat?
They meant to just say “Cat.” Damn autocorrect!
Cat cat in cat cat cat.
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
As a unix shell script:
(cat ‘cat’) in (cat ‘cat’ ‘cat’)Which should evaluate to true, because ‘cat’ can be found in ‘catcat’.
I think the least horrifying answer is word 2, referring to a consensual encounter between gay furries.
Did anyone ever find the answer
42
