Alphane Moon@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agoMillions turn to AI chatbots for spiritual guidance and confessionarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1135arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1129arrow-down1external-linkMillions turn to AI chatbots for spiritual guidance and confessionarstechnica.comAlphane Moon@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePasserby6497@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 hours ago if they are getting similar results. That ‘if’ is doing a hurculean amount of effort, given the reports of ChatGPT psychosis, because again, you’re dealing with a stochastic parrot not a real person giving you actual advice.
minus-squareNewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·42 minutes agoBelieve it or not AI results are doing fine, which is why people use it. Yes they will produce some funny/tragic results that are both memeable and newsworthy, but by and large they do what they are asked. If the results were poor you wouldn’t have adoption and your AI problem is solved. We have had chat bots since the late 90s. No one used them for therapy.
That ‘if’ is doing a hurculean amount of effort, given the reports of ChatGPT psychosis, because again, you’re dealing with a stochastic parrot not a real person giving you actual advice.
Believe it or not AI results are doing fine, which is why people use it.
Yes they will produce some funny/tragic results that are both memeable and newsworthy, but by and large they do what they are asked.
If the results were poor you wouldn’t have adoption and your AI problem is solved.
We have had chat bots since the late 90s. No one used them for therapy.