Should OS makers, like Microsoft, be legally required to provide 15 years of security updates?

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    15 years is too long, it doesn’t match the state of the industry or technological progress.

    If anything this slows down innovation which leads me to suspect the 15 year idea was though of by someone who dislikes any technical changes.

    • Rednax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Before Microsoft demanded TPM 2.0, you could install the latest version of Windows on extremely old hardware. Easily reaching that 15 years. We had this already. And Windows 11 can easily run without TPM 2.0. Microsoft just has business reasons to demand it. So I don’t see how innovation is slowed down by this.