Neat breakdown with data + some code.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s in every hydro dam that’s already built in between Arizona and New York. If we even do need more, there is plenty of land to use.

    This is the key factor I’m talking about. There is not “plenty of land” for hydro storage, and flooding the amount of land required to provide grid level storage is an ecological disaster. Plus your analysis of mega-project like nuclear plants going over budget and over-time absolutely applies to any grid-level storage project you would need to go 100% solar/wind.

    But just for fun, how much space would the grid level storage projects take up? I’ll let you use Hydro because it’s the best case scenario that exists today as far as energy density.

    But beyond that what is your point, that humans shouldn’t build big projects, and any attempt to do so is “boneheaded?” Capitalism can’t build big projects I agree, but the problem isn’t the projects themselves it’s the profit-motive.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There is not “plenty of land” for hydro storage, and flooding the amount of land required to provide grid level storage is an ecological disaster.

      We already built it. Good bye.