FenrirIII@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoFlying cars crash into each other at Chinese air showwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1176arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1173arrow-down1external-linkFlying cars crash into each other at Chinese air showwww.bbc.comFenrirIII@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square46fedilinkfile-text
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/36069403 cross-posted from: https://lemy.lol/post/52477761
minus-squareFauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down8·18 hours agoThe cars are autonomous, we need them because people can’t even manage a zip merge.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 hours agoSo the flying vehicles that apparently crashed into each other of their own accord are safer than cars? Really?
minus-squaremic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·14 hours agoKnow what can be automated a lot easier than cars or planes, and can carry orders of magnitude more people with much less fuel usage? Fucking trains.
minus-squareFauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·12 hours agoYeah, a quadcopter train sounds like the obvious next step.
The cars are autonomous, we need them because people can’t even manage a zip merge.
So the flying vehicles that apparently crashed into each other of their own accord are safer than cars? Really?
Know what can be automated a lot easier than cars or planes, and can carry orders of magnitude more people with much less fuel usage? Fucking trains.
Yeah, a quadcopter train sounds like the obvious next step.