• HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean yes but also it’s not that hard. Google is not trying to give you a great experience, they’re trying to drive clicks to ads.

    • Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s pretty telling a platform like YouTube really only gets fully enjoyable with an adblocker, sponsorblock and this. I wish PeerTube had a lot of good creators, but last time I checked (years ago, admittedly) it was mostly conspiracy theorists and cryptobros.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Don’t forget the PocketTube extension, which allows you to sort subscriptions into self-made categories. Which is shockingly not a default feature.

      • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The problem with PeerTube is that there’s no built-in way for creators to get paid. If there are no ads or sponsors, then the only alternative is some kind of value for value system like what Podcasting 2.0 has. Until some kind of well integrated funding system gets built for PeerTube, creators really are not going to be incentivized to publish stuff on the platform.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve used it for exactly three minutes and this is already amazing. I hope it gets integrated into ReVanced and Newpipe.

    • Kyogen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thanks, I didn’t know revanced was a thing. I only enjoyed old vanced for briefly in its last days. So good to hear theres still options like this around.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This add-on needs to:

    • Store unlimited amount of client-side data
    • Access your data for sites in the googlevideo.com domain
    • Access your data for sites in the youtube.com domain
    • Access your data for sponsor.ajay.app
    • Access your data for dearrow-thumb.ajay.app
    • Access your data for www.youtube-nocookie.com

    This add-on may also ask to: **Access your data for all websites

    Is there a better option than for it to need unlimited amount of client-side data? Also, why “Access your data for all websites”?-

    • ajay@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Creator of theq extension here, that is an optional permissions (may ask). It never asks to access to all sites, it only optionally let’s you add support for additional sites such as different Invidious instances. These are arbitrary domains, so it needs permission to ask for any arbitrary website.

      Support for invidious is not actually done yet, so right now, it never asks for permission for any new sites anyway

      The client side data is used to store your submissions to always show your preferred title, even if there is another submission on the server. You can disable this option in the settings

  • donotthecat@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    This feels like, IMHO, trying to put out a forest fire with a single bucket of water. Instead, we should have a platform that does not encourage making titles and thumbnails completely unrelated to the video’s content.

  • kratoz29@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    This sounds like a nice addon, sadly most of my YT consumption is done from my Nvidia Shield TV with STN, so I still get those annoying thumbnails I think (I have them in my home screen and that’s where I watch them or add them to the list to watch later within the Shield menu).

  • QubaXR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Love the idea, but just to be the devil’s advocate, I think it will just mask garbage videos. Currently, the clickbait thumbnails and titles are an indicator to blacklist a channel, without having to waste time watching it.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Unfortunately because of the way Youtube’s algorithm works, even high quality channels are buried if they don’t play the game.

        • d3Xt3r@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Got any examples? I don’t recall any actually quality and worthwhile channels that still use those dumb thumbnails.

          • squilox@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Veritasium, he even has a video crunching the numbers as an explanation why he has to doit

            • XaeroDegreaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Do you have a link to the video? I casually skimmed through his video list for the past year or so, but none of the titles jumped out at me for this.

              Could also be a good example of why this extension sounds cool haha

              Edit: Found it just a few more videos below here I stopped haha. “Clickbait is Unreasonably Effective” https://youtu.be/S2xHZPH5Sng

              • squilox@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Yeah, that one I stopped hating clickbait so much after watching it, trying to become immune to it

    • ajay@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If you look at the DeArrow website and browser extension pages, I made sure to only use high quality channels as examples (Tom Scott, CGP Grey) to demonstrate how far reaching the sensationalism problem is.

      • LichbaneLB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        CGP Grey is personally painful to me. He used to be a no-nonsense education youtube legend, but in the last few years he’s just maximised clickability - even going thorugh his whole back catalogue and changing titles and thumbnails.

        For example, he made a great video about generative adversarial networks ~5 years ago but now its titled “How machines like ChatGPT learn” - despite coming out before GPT.

        • dack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Pretty much every successful YouTube channel edits titles. It’s just part of the algorithm game now. You will often see videos cycle through several different titles shortly after release.