"High-altitude winds between 1,640 and 3,281 feet (500 and 10,000 meters) above the ground are stronger and steadier than surface winds. These winds are abundant, widely available, and carbon-free.

"The physics of wind power makes this resource extremely valuable. “When wind speed doubles, the energy it carries increases eightfold, triple the speed, and you have 27 times the energy,” explained Gong Zeqi "

  • Dionysus@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    High-altitude winds between 1,640 and 3,281 feet (500 and 10,000 meters) above the ground

    So y’all will have in depth conversations about the meaning of the colors of a fucking Labubu with ChatGPT, but can’t be bothered to ask it to do the math on this?

    Cause 10,000 meters isn’t 3,281 feet.

    • Auth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If anything that would be the china thing to do. This whole article is probably paid for as distraction while they add another 20 coal power stations and continue destroying the world with co2 emissions.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Super cool!

    …But helium, so not super scalable, right?

    They could make it hydrogen, for extra fun when one fails around all that electricity…

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The fact that helium is such a rare, irreplaceable, and scientifically useful material makes it wild to me that we use it to fill kids’ party balloons.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s not even being collected at the source (natural gas deposits) because it’s too cheap to be worth the extraction. This is because of the US liquidating its strategic reserve that it had been holding since the age of Zeppelins.

        Also for unmanned aircraft, using helium instead of hydrogen is just crazy

      • aburrito@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Good news, it’s not that rare that that would make a difference. There’s plenty of it, just need different extraction techniques to further up the supply (unfortunately, that’s fracking lately iirc)

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Could you use hot air? It might require some of the energy being generated be consumed, but its much more sustainable.

      • AceBonobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        So it’s a 100kW generator and you would need around 60kW to float the weight of a hot air balloon basket with a couple of people. My math is probably way off though.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Ok.

        As cool as this is, I"m also super interested in what happens if when the cables breaks.

        Like, how far will it go? A hundred kilometers? a thousand? Ten thousand? I just imagine one of things getting lose and it circling half the globe.