Also, they spy on you, can be bricked by the manufacturer, can therefore be used to extort money from you after buying it (depending on your country’s laws) and lock you into one ecosystem. The profit margin off of that is so high that “smart” TVs are always much cheaper than normal TVs, even with development costs and higher hardware costs. So you are the product.

And if you actually want to stream Netsucks or smth, plugging in your Laptop where you’re already logged in is much more convenient than using a native app on the TV. And ofc you don’t have to use some broken, outdated YouTube unshittifier that Google keeps breaking on there, you can just use piped/invidious in your Laptops/Mini-PCs browser. Also, not having any apps on a fucking TV means not requiring Network access, so no spying, updating etc. anyway.

There’s also a longevity mismatch. The streaming device goes obsolete much faster than the display. At worst, you’ve got a bunch of buttons snd icons for dead services or “your device is no longer supported” tutning your home theatre into a dead mall.

It’s sort of like when they used to make low-end TVs with VCRs and DVD players built in. Nobody was doing that on top of the line sets because you wanted to keep it for 10 years, and the DVD player would give out much sooner.

I think one brand tried to make a modular component to allow for smart upgrades, but without industry standards, it was a predestined dead end. Thry should have just out a slot in the cabinet sized to fit a Roku/Fire stick and let customers swap them every few years.