• EarthshipTechIntern01@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    How would it have been better if they were kids? It’d be worse: displaying the kind of bullshit being handed down to the next generation.

    They’re inept, stupid, racist adults. Pray they don’t teach kids to be like themselves (though I’m sure they will).

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Some of these “kids” are older than Charlie Kirk. They were literally all in the same age range and demographic. This is the modern Republican party when you don’t include the old people.

      • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        “Boys will be boys” was always about getting into foolish hijinks. It has been co-opted by shitheads to excuse abhorrent behavior. And every time it happens there needs to be significant pushback from from folks to take it back from the bastards.

        • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          sadly it’s hard to take back a term.

          shitheads missuse the term

          normal people then avoid such term

          now it’s a bad term

          any attempt at reclaiming it will be suspicious as if someone just wants an excuse to use that word.

          it’s mostly a slut thing.

          but with slurs it’s “easier” to reclaim, as the community affected by it, can choose to use it.

          in this case it’s different.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think it was more of a euphemism for stupidity than a dog whistle for mysogyny.

        • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          it’s often used to excuse male children or teens (or young men) of misogynistic acts.

          although originally meant for general youth stupidity.

          it’s a good dogwhistle because it comes with plausible deniability.

          it depends on the context.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    18 hours ago

    One problem with this defense? The people in the group chat aren’t “kids.” By scanning public records and media reports, Mother Jones determined the ages of eight of the 11 participants in the chat: They appear to range from 24 to 35. Ages for three other participants—Bobby Walker, Michael Bartels, and Rachel Hope—were not publicly available. Bartels declined to comment to Politico, and the outlet could not reach Hope for comment. Walker told Politico parts of the chat “may have been altered, taken out of context, or otherwise manipulated,” adding, “The language is wrong and hurtful, and I sincerely apologize.”

    • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      17 hours ago

      “You don’t get it, when I was dropping n-bombs, the context was crucial! It was an ironic hard-r!”

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This is just what leaked. The youngish adults staffing all these senators’ and representatives’ offices are barely any older, and are probably saying the same shit.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Let’s say for the benefit of the doubt this was a chat composed entirely of children. Where did these “children” learn all that talk? As young republicans maybe from older republicans or their Republican parents. Them being actual kids would make it worse