• emmy67@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    How many misunderstandings happen because people are bad at both writing and talking?

    The answer is, a great deal.

    Your answer is nonsense.

    There is no real use case for the user. There are only use cases for the company.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’d say there would be a great benefit for a lot of e.g. disabled people who can’t use the traditional inputs. Not saying that as a pro-ai/pro-win argument. Just that there actually will be good use-cases.

      • emmy67@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s not a use case for users. That’s a use case for a very specific sub group who likely weren’t using the OS at all. Not saying it’s not good they would be able to if that works for them, which I doubt.

        Its still not a reason to foist it onto all of us

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Didn’t say that was a reason to gulp it down. Just that the use cases aren’t zero.

          Knew a quadriplegic that gamed with her mouth on windows. A really well working, integrated “ai” would’ve dramatically improved her life and saved her hundreds of thousands for all the equipment and tech-guys. And yes, that’s a very limited use case, but would allow poorer disabled people to also use a computer better.

          But that’s really all good reasons I can come up with. For all else noone needs the shit baked into the OS.