Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday accused the Trump administration of “rigging the election” by dispatching federal poll monitors to five California counties, as voters cast ballots on Newsom’s Proposition 50 redistricting measure.

The Department of Justice announced Friday that it would deploy personnel to polling sites in Fresno, Kern, Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside counties to “ensure transparency, ballot security, and compliance with federal law,” ahead of the state’s Nov. 4 special election.

In an interview with KQED’s Political Breakdown, Newsom said the move was a “setup” for the Trump administration to cast doubt on the potential victory of Proposition 50 — a plan to redraw the state’s congressional district lines to advantage Democrats.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    3 days ago

    2026 is going to be madness. And if Democrats don’t take the house, 2028 will be the end.

    • edible_funk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      We are commenting on a thread about the current president openly interfering in state elections. It can be assumed the elections will be compromised.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          So far. Trump is already threatening to change this by sending troops to cities to enforce his election rules.

            • danc4498@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Are you a time traveler that has skipped past the last 9 months? Trump doesn’t care what the constitution says or about states rights. He’s sending trips in against the will of the governors.

              • Natanael@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                You have no idea how few the federal troops really are, you think they’re more powerful than they are because you’ve only seen reports on where they’ve been striking performatively.

                If Trump sent every federal agent they had into New York city, the city could dedicate less than half of their police force to arrest them all. They wouldn’t need to call the national guard, or any other security forces.

                And then there’s no feds left to try anything in any other state.

                • danc4498@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 hours ago

                  Obviously that’s now how it’s going to work. They will strategically send them to polling places where the margins between democrats and republicans is close enough. Send 10 guardsmen and 3 ICE agents to each of these polling places and that may be all it takes to keep the house in 2026.

                  Below article tells you the 27 districts they will focus on first. How many guardsmen and ICE agents would you need to make any impact on 27 districts?

                  https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/competitive-districts-will-decide-control-house

                  Edit: that link was from 2024 btw. 2026 probably has a new set of districts.

                  • Natanael@infosec.pub
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    14 hours ago

                    Only the smaller states are at any real risk, and only if they don’t cooperate with the larger democratic states to place troops to protect the sites

                    There’s more than enough available to the states if they decide to enforce safety that the feds simply can’t do anything

        • edible_funk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          No shit Nate. Y’all need to update your talking points, that one doesn’t hold water anymore.

          • Natanael@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Who’s the one with talking points? Because that one’s from the constitution. Push the states to oppose Trump’s interference

            • edible_funk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Trump has violated the letter of the Constitution dozens of times. We are literally on a thread about Trump sending feds to ratfuck local elections. Give your balls a tug and get your head out your ass.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not a binary issue. Elections have been getting more and more compromised for decades. 2026 will be even more compromised. They will not be entirely compromised, and we have to keep working from the assumption that they won’t be unwinnable, even while preparing for the possibility that we might not win them.

        Honestly, I fear that Democrats are more responsible for hurting their chances than Republicans. Even as bad as things have gotten, the Democratic establishment has continued to dig in and refuse to give any ground whatsoever to progressives. It’s becoming a real mask-off moment for a lot of rank and file liberals.

        • edible_funk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Looks like the Russian bots have gotten to lemmy. Fuck outta here with your literal Russian bot propaganda talking point.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            LOL, wut? Yeah, there aren’t any Americans fed up with the Democratic establishment. I’m just making that shit up. Haha, you got me.

            BTW: Has Schumer endorsed Mamdani yet?

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Stop relying on elections to save you. You can’t vote your way out of fascism. The only way out is through mass civil unrest. Strikes, blackouts, protests.

      • Jerkface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        But that point of contention is too important. Dems need to take the house in order to build the narrative that precedes the unrest. It’s going to be a lot harder to send that message if they appear too unpopular to do that.

        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s why they need to control the media narratives.
          And why they want to make negative opinions of the regime illegal.
          Once they’ve made it illegal and can control the media they now have created an environment of fear where no one even trusts their neighbor.
          The knock on effect is that it is now harder to organize resistance because even expressing dissent has been outlawed.

    • 4grams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m pretty sure we’ve crossed that rubicon, the last election was just that. Cross your fingers if you must, but I don’t believe for one second that votes matter anymore in the “united” states.