The initiative has reached the required signature threshold in 15 countries, with Germany and France – the two largest – expected to follow suit.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    1 day ago

    And your solution is put down the one that did?

    The EU citizens initiative objectively improves our chances of having a slightly better society in the future.

    And that does not happen at the expense of some other arbitrary more important potential improvement.

    So you are literally just complaining about something getting better.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        87
        ·
        1 day ago

        Then get off your ass and start and promote the petition you want to see instead of whining about what you do see.

        Assuming you want to do more than just complain about shit on the Internet while actually doing nothing, that is.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        No you aren’t.

        There is absolutely nothing here indicating the people who care about this, don’t care about other issues, or only do so second. That is an assumption, and entirely on you.

        If anything, this was so successful because it might actually work.

        A bunch of EU citizen signatures wishing a war to end wouldn’t do shit.

        • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          49
          ·
          1 day ago

          Honestly (their) opinion needs to die. Any time people mobilise in big numbers to participate in democracy is a good thing on general principles, and unless people are signing a petition by the millions to like, make babies try cigarettes, it’s almost always going to be a good thing. It’s nirvana fallacy from top to bottom.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            Exactly. And once people sign a petition and see it actually get implemented increases the chance that they’ll get involved next time.

            This petition is great because it’s:

            • actionable - it’s easy to see what the expectation out of a suggested policy is
            • non-specific - there are a bunch of laws around this, and having a specific petition that happens to be illegal is a great way to get it killed
            • broadly relevant - almost everyone who plays games cares, and gamers tend to complain more than act, so this is a baby step to get those people invested in action; even people who don’t care about games could care, such as right to repair people, since this lays a framework to get similar policies enacted

            Something like homeless doesn’t have as clear of direction on solutions. Likewise ads, since that runs afoul of how tons of businesses make money, but this could be leveraged to reduce/eliminate ads in games that you pay for.

            If this petition actually goes somewhere, I sincerely believe we’ll see more petitions from people who otherwise wouldn’t speak out. Ross was one of those people, and if he sees success, he’ll inspire a bunch of other people like him to act. I think it’s fantastic.

          • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Frankly if people are petitioning the government en masse to allow babies to smoke, I think the government should at least seriously consider it. Democracy isn’t just for when ideas are good.

            By that I mean that such petitions shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand, I don’t think that babies should be allowed to smoke, unless they can make cool smoke rings.

            • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              That’s what representatives are for, they hear the public and form a committee of experts, who then say no that’s insane, then we either go fuck ourselves or we riot. At some point down the line absolutely nobody’s happy, and that’s how you know you’re in a healthy democracy.

              • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I mean ideally any proposed law would go to referendum if there’s a popular enough petition for or against.

                • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  There does have to be a formal process to make sure the voters are being asked a question that is sane to begin with, and not merely being offered the chance to wreck their economy on behalf of moneyed interests. It’s a truism that when the questions are insane, the answers don’t matter. Whether it’s Brexit or smoking babies, there’s always an issue with vested interests having their own say on the matter.