Minecraft: Java Edition has been obfuscated since its release. This obfuscation meant that people couldn’t see our source code. Instead, everything was scrambled – and those who wanted to mod Java Edition had to try and piece together what every class and function in the code did.

Modding is at the heart of Java Edition – and obfuscation makes modding harder. We’re excited about this change to remove obfuscation, as it should make it quicker and easier for modders to create and improve mods. Now you won’t have to untangle tricky code or deal with unclear names. What’s more, de-bugging will become more straightforward, and crash logs will actually be readable!

surprisingly fantastic and consumer friendly move from mojang, good on them

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I mean releasing the source under a license like GPL (or whatever the modern equivalent is).

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Because then anyone could fork it and redistribute the game which I presume they don’t want.

      It would be sweet for us if they did, but I can see why they don’t want to do that.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        They could distribute source ports of the game, but you’d still have to buy the game in order to make use of them. Textures, sound effects, animations, etc. are (usually) not source code.

        That’s why people still buy Doom 2 even though it was open-sourced in 1997.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Fork it and use your own texture and sound pack doesn’t sound like much work tbh. Any major modpack could just redistribute the game as a fork and it would be awesome. But Microsoft probably don’t want that.

        • sus@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          The small amount of sales of doom 2 today is not at all comparable to the massive amount of minecraft sales and minecraft-related microtransactions that microsoft is raking in. Doom has many modern sequels that are far more popular today than doom 2, while minecraft does not have any official sequel.

          • chunes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Open-sourcing Doom increased, rather than decreased sales.

            Doom also went open source long before there were any sequels, and while it was still the hottest shit in PC gaming.