• ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Half Life 2 was about 5 years too early to be considered “basically beyond imptovement”. The graphics are a little dated now, and maybe the gameplay is a little simpler than a modern FPS, but ultimately it’s pretty close to the mark. I haven’t been surprised by FPS mechanics or graphics in 10 years, so there’s basically no way for Half Life 3 to surprise us. Dishonored 1 and 2 were basically identical. If you told me the second one came out immediately after, I’d believe you.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Yeah, thats fair, I’m not trying to personally say HL2 is literally perfect, and I don’t think Valve are either…

      But they’re saying that, by the time people really really wanted Half Life 3… they knew they would have to do something so revolutionary, so much better, to top it… that it actually wasn’t possible.

      So, think outside the box, innovate elsewhere, all the other shit they’ve done?

      Conceptually and practically easier than making a sequel that would live up to HL3 expectations.

      Although, there are apparently reports/rumors that they are now actually trying to do HL3.

      But that has been the case for almost two decades.

      … these things, they take time.