• Noja@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Memory leaks are logic errors, Rust can’t really prevent you from leaking memory.

      • Mechanize@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        You can leak memory in perfectly safe Rust, because it is not a bug per se, an example is by using Box::leak

        Preventing memory leaks was never in the intentions of Rust. What it tries to safeguard you from are Memory Safety bugs like the infamous and common double free.

        • 8uurg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          And it still cleans up once the ownership model indicates it can be cleaned up. That does not ensure memory is never leaked, but it is equivalent to destructors running automatically when using unique ptr or shared ptr without cycles in C++, which avoids at least a portion of possible memory leaks.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Some memory leaks are logic errors, and this is honestly the irony of modern dynamic languages. I have actually gotten into the argument in interviews before - it is arguably safer (and better) to work from maximal static memory allocations with memory safe data objects than it is to implement dynamic memory algorithms just because they are fun coding problems.