• Damarus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would primarily understand it as being free of generative AI (picture and sound), which is what is most obvious when actually playing a game. I’m personally not against using LLMs for coding if you actually know what you’re doing and properly review the output. However at that point most will come to the conclusion that you could write the code manually anyways and probably save time.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Using ai to generate samples to get a framework of the product would be permitted or not? Is placeholder generation allowed?

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Since you would never see it that’s pretty much irrelevant. Clearly this is about AI generated art and AI generated assets

        Whether or not you use AI to grey box something is a pointless distinction given the fact that there’s no way to prove it one way or the other.

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          But it still removes labor from the working class. My point is that the lines are blurry. You practically cannot draw a useful line based on the tooling used.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            The AI label needs to be present if the finished product contains AI generated assets. So AI generated code, or AI generated art.

            In the example above you grey boxed in AI but then replaced all the assets with ones that humans made. There is no distinction there between doing that and just having literal grey boxes.

            You couldn’t require an AI label in that scenario because it would be utterly unenforceable. How would a developer prove if they did or did not use AI for temporary art?

            So yes you can draw a line. Does the finished product contain AI generated assets. You don’t like that definition because you’re being pedantic but your pedantry interpretation isn’t enforceable, so it’s useless.

            • Gladaed@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Is a scene arranged by AI not undesirable since it does not have artistic intent?

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                I feel like you have never actually developed a game. Because what you’re arguing is just weird. It makes no logical sense.

                A grey box is the very most basic of what a game will ever be, it never bears any resemblance to the finished product. It is the basis most fundamental interpretation of game mechanics and systems. The gray box has no bearing on the final result of the game.

                No grey box contains any aspect of artistic intent, the art team are never even involved in its creation it’s always just developers doing things. Go look up some game blogs.

                • Gladaed@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  A placeholder is more than a grey box and a placeholder for e g. Loading screens may influence the final drawing.