“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable,” Orwell wrote
The lack of transparency depicted in “1984” has an uncanny echo in our current political moment, despite Leavitt’s repeated assertions that Donald Trump is the “most transparent president in history.”
Leavitt has made that claim countless times, including in her public defense of Trump’s “Quiet, Piggy!” dismissal of Bloomberg News journalist Catherine Lucey last month.
In Leavitt’s usage, “transparency” has become a form of Orwellian “doublespeak,” a word or phrase which through the process of “doublethink” had come to encompass its exact opposite meaning.
"Doublethink," in Orwell’s writing, was the mechanism of thought manipulation that allowed someone “to know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them.”



Doublethink would require think. I don’t think that’s something Leavitt does much of.
It’s not so much that she’s thinking, it’s that the language that she’s parroting requires training oneself to doublethink to maintain the illusion that the Trump administration is anything but a tool of fascism.
Doublethink? Bestie, I don’t even think once.