Key Points

Trump’s battleship plan clashes with decades of U.S. naval strategy and technology shifts

Experts described it as a “prestige project,” a “bomb magnet” and said that “this ship will never sail.”

Even if it were technically feasible, the cost of building the battleship would be prohibitive.

  • AshMan85@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Like, the navy hasn’t used battleships in decades because they are obsolete to deystroyers, that kind of obstacle?

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      With future weaponry they might see a come back

      These extremely high powered laser weapons need large battery banks which seem to be usable as a power source for railguns too. Big boats might make sense, and with laser weapons mostly obsoleting air attacks they’d be a lot less of a sitting duck

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yeah the next generation of serious combat will probably be significantly influenced by who has the best underwater capabilities, unless someone builds some kind of flying fortress for laser attacks and air denial

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Personally, I think a “battleship” designed solely for coastal bombardment duties would be the best fit for a modernized version. A Siege Ship, I guess? Provided the artillery shells are cheap, they can be constantly lobbed with great range and power at stationary targets. This would free up expensive missiles and aircraft for tasks beyond the reach or accuracy of the artillery.