• uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Fuck off with your both sides bullshit.

      One is a company trying to drive itself into the ground and getting stopped left and right by the 12 of us who still believe in the mission.

      One is a homophobic crypto-scammer upset at getting kicked out of the other org.

      Edit: Speak of the devil, this just showed up in my all: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/36237549

      Despite the similarities in phrasing, no idea who that person is.

        • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          They seem fine as far as I know. I think it isn’t that stable in my experience, but I’m not aware of them doing anything bad. The only other browser I’ve heard of being questionable (besides chrome/edge obviously) is waterfox where it got bought by an ad-oriented company but has supposedly stayed separate from the ad part of the business. Could be a long-term trap, I suppose, but a trap for like 0.01% of the browser market doesn’t seem that useful.

          • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I think the best part about Vivaldi is that it lets you put the tabs to the side, and also has a built-in ad-and-tracker-blocker, despite letting you install ad-block extensions (because Vivaldi is a Chromium browser). Seriously!

      • pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I mean I don’t like that Mozilla donations finance weird congresses on Africa, that sounds like they are going to SPAs and getting a lot of sex with donation money instead of improving FF.