• grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    The president portrayed the move as a boost for American shipbuilding and vowed to be personally involved in the ships’ development. “The U.S. Navy will lead the design of these ships along with me,” he said, “because I’m a really aesthetic person.”

    No one is even going to have to torpedo this thing because it’s going to be solid gold and immediately sink to the bottom of the sea.

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Aesthetics? For a military vehicle? It’s not a shitty casino Don, it doesn’t matter how pretty it is, anyone with half a brain knows that focusing on appearance will only make it a worse functional vehicle.

      • Insekticus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        And the Yamato battleship of the Japanese empire.

        Building the biggest and heavily armed and armored dreadnought of the second world war, when technology pushed to using planes as a form of combat, led it to being nearly useless

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Well also the admiralty was paranoid about it being sunk so it basically never left the Japanese home islands. Personally I think the Bismarck is a better comparison, especially since it was more or less taken out by a swordfish an aging plane design with way too many names taken.