• lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago
    Post needs accessibility.

    Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative:

    • usability
      • we can’t quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR
      • text search is unavailable
      • the system can’t
        • reflow text to varied screen sizes
        • vary presentation (size, contrast)
        • vary modality (audio, braille)
    • accessibility
      • lacks semantic structure (tags for titles, heading levels, sections, paragraphs, lists, emphasis, code, links, accessibility features, etc)
      • some users can’t read the image due to lack of alt text (markdown image description)
      • users can’t adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments
      • systems can’t read the text to them or send it to braille devices
    • searchability: the “text” isn’t indexable by search engine in a meaningful way
    • fault tolerance: no text fallback if
      • image breaks
      • image host is geoblocked due to insane regulations.

    Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images.

    This comic sure rustled an awful lot of jimmies.
    meme: that really rustled my jimmies

    • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Why do you keep responding with “needs accessibility”? What, precisely, is the remedy you’re requesting on these comics? Transcripts?

      • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        There are a number of possible remedies, so I don’t specify. All that matters is the result: web accessibility. Doesn’t matter how text alternative is provided whether by

        • adequately filling field Alt Text in post submission/edit forms
        • setting the field URL to a source or archival snapshot that is accessible
        • providing an accessible description in the field Title or Body
        • beginning the field Body with a link (so it’s directly adjacent to image) to an accessible equivalent or description

        or any other possibility as long as it achieves accessibility.

        In general, it depends on the situation. Screenshot of social media text content: link to the source or its archival snapshot. Image of pure text: don’t post that, post text instead.

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Probably that, I know on Mastodon people add a caption to pretty much every picture for screen readers, searching, etc.

        It’s pretty convenient IME and doesn’t take much time. If that’s what they’re asking it’s a decent idea but they need to be clear.