• azuth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Money, gambling is (even if obfuscated via tokens) about money.

    Monopoly is not gambling because there is no (real) money involved. Uno is not gambling because there is no money involved.

    • utopiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Uno is not gambling because there is no money involved.

      Uno is not gambling because all decks are the same. There is no artificial scarcity to monetize, it’s literally just a game and that’s good.

        • utopiah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Uno can be gambling too if you start to bet on round. Anything can be gambling if you want it to but poker with non convertible tokens isn’t gambling. Betting on players also would be gambling. Anything can become gambling. If you think that’s an overstatement look at predictive markets to see how broad bettable events can be, it’s amazing scary.

            • utopiah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              What I tried to express is that when decks are

              • NOT the same
              • AND are sealed
              • AND there is a distribution of the content (namely some rare and non rare items)

              then the purchase of that deck itself is gambling.

              That does not imply anything about other situations, namely decks that are all the same can still be used for gambling when there are played with rules that do introduce randomness. A single coin for example can be used to bet.