As Phụ Nữ reports, Vietnam recently announced Decree No. 342, which details a number of provisions to the national Advertising Law, due to take effect from February 15, 2026. The adjustments are expected to place stricter control on Vietnam’s online advertising activities to protect consumers and curb illegal ads.

Amongst the decree articles, some standout stipulations include a hard cap on the waiting time before viewers can skip video and animated ads to no more than 5 seconds. Static ads must be immediately cancellable.

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It very much is possible to ban “all” public and even commercial VPNs. VPN traffic tends to have very distinct characteristics in logs and it is not overly difficult for orgs to get the IP ranges allocated to each company.

    What is not possible is banning all vpn traffic in the sense that a friend or family member sets up wireguard for you. But that is a drop in the bucket to the point of being functionally nonexistent.

    The middle ground, of course, are pseudo-botnets of compromised computers. But those also tend to be a fairly small percentage (outside of DDOSing) and are likely getting blocked for other reasons.

    • Tanoh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      There are even companies selling lists of IPs for all sort of behaviour and characteristics. Just adding one of those is trivial.

      Though google has a lot more data and engineers so they could just create a better one themselves.

      It is a constant cat and mouse game between VPN providers and other actors. A few IPs get on a list, they try to find others, repeat

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        If your corporate VPN is routing ALL traffic then your IT department are idiots. And I am pretty sure said company would thank google for blocking youtube from their employees.

        • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Depends.
          I am in uni, so a bit different, but there’s many sites that allow access to articles, studies, books, etc. to us based on source IP. And I guess it could be hard to route only those, especially if some of them decide to use Cloudflare or similar.

          Another option is doing so for easier monitoring of work devices that people will always try to use for things they’re not supposed to.

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            And, when discussing stuff like this, it is important to understand that “all VPNs” actually means corporate and public VPNs.

            If you want to have an actual conversation then context matters. Rather than just fixating on nonsensical overly literal interpretations because you only want to be “technically correct” by attacking a strawman.