That destroys someone’s shelter and potentially injures or kills them. Not to mention the mental grief losing your home causes people. That is not good for their well-being.
(Edit):Also, I’m not even saying it’s a good moral system. In fact I don’t think it’s possible to have an objective moral standard that isn’t majorly flawed or incomplete.
I’m saying definitionally wecanmeasure morality objectively, not that it’s a good idea.
What if someone is a pyromaniac and letting them set fires to people’s houses improves their wellbeing?
That destroys someone’s shelter and potentially injures or kills them. Not to mention the mental grief losing your home causes people. That is not good for their well-being.
(Edit): Also, I’m not even saying it’s a good moral system. In fact I don’t think it’s possible to have an objective moral standard that isn’t majorly flawed or incomplete.
I’m saying definitionally we can measure morality objectively, not that it’s a good idea.